It is fact of scientific discovery that only half the world is known properly In the unknown half we are gradually realising people exist in it who are at risk at our hands The scientists have to convince them of their ideas and what they believe is as weird as ever. Some of these people statistically make up our own civilisation and are not agreeing that science is corect in its present form. Its a lot of old guff about particle gods they cant find anyway.

True;if youwoke up in the ancient world to a pile of fish
distributed eberywhere over miles you would say it was a sign that life started with them The Gods answered their prayers always;the cause was hardly understood. So many fish in the sea more than humans means they must have had longer time to be there to expand like humans So they came first in the creations stor.Simple really
I am chas g.I know these thigs from long term 'tinks'as old Albert Einetein would say.

The poisons in the atmosphere are removed by circulation and weater If these were affected by anything these creatures who also contrinbute to the filth would have had a disease hit them anyway. I am chas g and I have thoughts regularly about the old world.

I think the correct word would be 'inadequate' its this site which should be thought of as collecting the reality theories and affects of education Irrespective of its own brand of mistakes;its the best ever.

I figure that any two or more so called laws of natural orde can work together to change things thereby defying logic later so to speak eg SHORT TERM EXAMPLE;Iron is heavier than water and sinks It is still a truth that iron ships float. Thus more complex forms of change are logically possible Time passing on the scale of evolution works miracles. I amchas g with these thoughts of the incomprehensable origin to ALLTHINGS even though we find out how elements work the whole is GREATER THAN THE SUM OF THE PARTS.

Fires can cause a depletion of trees and essential water.
It is known that dinosaurs caught in niches round the coasts of continents would be feeding on the type of foilage and trees available at that level but unable to get back to the higher ground after the geology drammatically changes The new type of leaves and trees formed a different sort of food source since these old creatures became extinct
It is aknown feature of forests that the trees carry oils in them They burn after several centuries of becoming more dense quite naturally So that new ash was laid down and new growths followwed for different creatures
I am chas g with these thougthts to help alittle more,

ALL MEN DIE ANYWAY I RECKON WE ARE KNOWING THIS ALWAYS .
MY AGE IS OLDER THAN MOST ON THIS SITE I GUESS IT DOESNT MATTER
What matters is mankind can as a race continue to learn how to save itself unafraid of the big questions/
When the earth reacts and the rocks fall the bal of nature is affected It may be that we must die eventually for similar reasons. Slowly creatures are getting extinct as a matter of course There is nothing to say we are different.

IFF this AmazingGrace you are on about IS aspowerful an undercurrent -clearly masked-then it may save us from all wars

THE ICA NAZCA PATTERNS ON THE GROUND OVER A LARGE AREA ARE SURELY CHALLENGING THE STONES MUST SAY SOMETHING ELSE
IT MAY BE A REAL TRUTH NON FICTION JUT THE SAME THAT THEY HADA WAY OF USING A SAIL OF SOME KIND TO SEE WHAT THESE INSECT PATTERNS LOOKED LIKE ANOTHER THEORY IS THAT THEY WERE MATHEMATICAL AND INTELLIGENT A COMMON ERROR OF MODERNAGE IS TO THINK OTHERWISE IT WAS A RESPONSE TO SOMETHING IN THE HEAVENS ABOVE I RECKON...BUT WHAT AND WHY ARE THERE NO DINASAURS IN THESE OLD PATTERNS?

Which Deluge? Certainly not the Noaic account complete with the Arc.

Between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2 there is a gap some believe to be millions of years old. The verses read: Gen. 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." Gen 1:2 "And the earth was without form and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit off God moved upon the face of the waters." (AKJV)

We see here an earth in ruin. Obviously flooded and time and space and matter already in existance prior to God proclaiming "Let there be light".(Gen. 1:3)

The prevailing thought on this is that from the time if Gen 1:1 and Gen 1:2 eons of time had passed, during which period we know that Lucifer rebelled against God and his rebelion led to the destruction of the entire universe. When the last of the earth's inhabitants died off, God intervened and kick started the universe back to life.

A good reference to this theroy is the book by Gaines R. Johnson: "The Bible Genesis and Geology". You can also visit his website, www.kjvbible.org for a complete explanation of this subject.

Hmmmm.. I guess that u r right. Not good neighbors at all. I think that ther e was a huge drought and the plants died. Then the plant eaters died. And without the plant eaters, the carnivores turned against each other. The ones who didn't eat their brethren just died off. Makes sense, right??




-KittyKat

Nobody knows exactly what happened to the dinosaurs. There are many theories.

There are so many theories no body realy no the truth of what killed them they are stiil working on these theories today hope someone will find the truth.

Bones have been found throughout our history by many different races.
one example was in ancient greece where they found a breeding ground with fossilised eggs of beaked dinosaurs which then they started a myth of the griffen a half lion half bird creature which scared people into venturing past a mountain range where they said these creatures lived.
there was also many fossilised elephant skulls found throughout asia 1000s of years ago and people believed they were the skulls of giant cyclops.

Thats an amazing image of mass extinction you just created fantastic.

Dragons are actually imagined species of the chinese or other cultures to explain the wide phenomenon of flaming materials in the sky.As what history channel says, dragons are actually space ships of anciant aliens visiting earth.Try to compare a dragon blowing fire out of his mouth and the apollo 13 launched on the sky.See any similarities?And people that time dont have the word spaceships to explain it, do they?

You are probably right.

Astronomers believe that, some 65 million years ago a 10km diameter asteroid crashing to the earth may have been a responsible cause for wiping out the dinosaurs. it would have caused a catastrophic explosion, affecting the climate and chemical composition of the atmosphere and destroying the plants and animals on which the dinosaurs fed.

Wasn't it a astroid

I think you looked it in the eyes.

A bbig band :P

What killed dinosaurs?? Well first of all they were killed because everything dried up and that made them die because they had no food....

There are many different theories but we must remember that they all didnt just die in a second. there has never been a meteor impact big enough for the shock wave to spread across the entire earth, and one disease couldn't have killed killed all the species so i have come up with my own theory and i believe it makes the most sense.
The dinosaurs were going strong and in a historical blink of an eye,a new age was here. i think that the environment was getting too cold, dinosaurs (as all reptiles) are cold-blooded so a sudden change in the environment could easily trip them up. and when the cloud of ash from the meteor strike blocked out the sun,there was no hope. it was getting too cold too fast. the shock wave had wiped out a good percentage already and when the dinosaurs became defenseless and immobile they starved and freezed to death. And this theory is also relevant to why mammals survived , being so adaptable.

Guys,

You might want to take a look at what I believe I have uncovered as a trigger to large high energy events on earth. It is shocking to me and answers alot of questions. Please pass the link along if you would like

http://darkmattersalot.com

Lol stars dont move to be able to crash into the earth and even if they did stars would be too huge to be stopped by earth as it would just completely destroy our little planet

But in the theory of the meteorite the dust cloud was large enough to cover the whole earth and thick enough to block out the sun completely and lasted for years therefor all plant life would perish causing chain reaction of death. same as the volcanoes so much ash blocked out sun for years same results that is how the theories went when i read them it is a fact that a meteor has hit in mexico with force enough to make a hole 10 miles deep and 180 miles wide cannot argue that not saying any of these are true but they make most sense to me explains all death and ice age as well without the sun heating the earth by day temperatures would drop significantly

No way aa virous could spread across the whole earth back then with no planes to fly across oceans especially to cause massive extinction in same time era

Dinosaurs lived to quite recent times actually and some may still be alive. Here are a group of dinosaurs in antique West African art that demonstrates that dinosaurs lived long into the age of man. In fact the age of dinosaurs and the age of man began in the same week.

http://s8int.com/WordPress/2013/02/13/despite-coelacanth-does-the-evolutionary-dogma-re-man-and-dinosaur-remain-unshakenor-do-those-dogon-antique-dinosaurs-of-west-africa-prove-science-is-myth-staken/

I guess it is an alien.

[url=http://www.weddingdressbbs.com/wedding-dress-c-540.html]Wedding Dress Discount,Custom,Wholesale,Online Sales,Brides,Bridesmaid,Evening,Birthday,Holiday,Graduation,Cocktail Dress[/url]

"A man should look for what is and not for what he thinks should be." -Albert Einstein. If you are a truth seeker, go to TruthContest ) c0m and open *The Present.* This is truth you can check.

You seem to be posting this in every thread you can. Yes, it is truth we can check. When we do, we find it is false.

"Charles Darwin revealed how evolution works, but not what it really means.

Evolution is no longer just a theory; it has been proven true beyond a reasonable doubt. The problem is, even people who accept evolution is true disassociate themselves from the process. They somehow skipped all the lower forms of animal life and just started out at the top of the evolutionary ladder."

There is no "evolutionary ladder". Evolution is not "progress" to our species. The American Museum of Natural History portrays it more accurately: a large circle with living species on the circumference and the extinct species within the circle.

So, the first paragraph contains a falsehood about evolution.

"The evidence says we evolved as life evolved.

Human beings did not just appear at the top of the evolutionary ladder to reap the benefits of those millions of years of evolution without having to live through it.

In other words, you were those other animals. Someone had to be them."

This is not evolution. Our species -- H. sapiens -- evolved from H. heidelbergensis over a period of 250,000 to about 100,000 years ago.

Think about this on a personal level. According to this idea, I personally did not "just appear" as this generation to "reap the benefits" of all my human ancestors. The first Lucas for my family arrived in Maryland from England in 1684. Did I have to be that ancestor? NO!

No living person or member of H. sapiens had to be any earlier species. The idea that "someone had to live through it" or "Someone had to be them" is a logical does-not-follow.

"You had to be lower animals to be a human now. You lived as all the different animals in your evolutionary line. You lived through millions of years, and millions of lives and deaths to get to where you are now. That's what Darwin's book means."

Really? I had to live through all the lives and deaths of every Lucas in America since 1684? How about my grandfather? He was alive when I was born? How could I live his life when I was alive?

Origin of Species does NOT mean this. Nonsense. Each individual of each species is a separate life. Evolution happens to POPULATIONS of individuals, not the individual itself.

"In addition to the fossil evidence, the genetic code proves that all animals, including us, evolved from bacteria over the last 700 million years on earth.

In other words, you were a microbe, an insect, a fish, a dinosaur, an ape..."

I am a unique combination of alleles (forms of genes). Many of those GENES didn't exist back then. For instance, I have at least 13 types of collagen, each with their own genes. Bacteria have NO collagen. Fish have only 3 or four. What's more, insects and dinosaurs are NOT on the family tree for humans! They are branches. Yes, we share a common ancestor with dinosaurs, but we did NOT evolve from dinosaurs. Our common ancestor was a species of reptile.

As I said, each of us is a unique combination of alleles. Since that combination NEVER EXISTED BEFORE, WE never existed before. For instance, my father has a mutation that resulted in his having 2 renal arteries. No other human I know of has 2 renal arteries. No other species has 2 renal arteries. Therefore, I personally could not have been any of those.

If you want to believe in reincarnation, do so. But don't tell us this belief derives from evolution. That is false. Yes, Einstein was right that we should look for "what is". This website is all about "what he thinks should be". It violates the very principle Einstein was talking about. When we check this "truth", we find it is false.

Maybe continuous weight of gravitation and Dinosaurs had grew...

Maybe continuous weight of gravitation and Dinosaurs had grew...

??? You do know dinosaurs ranged from the size of a chicken up to the size of Sauropods like brontosaurus. Right? Not all dinos were big. Velociraptors, for example, were about the size of humans (you did see the Jurassic Park movies right? Remember the very small Compsagnathus?). Do you think the "continuous weight of gravitation" is going to cause us to go extinct?

The extinction at the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary is very rapid in geological terms. Several lines of evidence point to a large meteor impact. On the other side, many dino populations had been undergoing a tens of millions of years long decline in population before the K-T extinction.

There is nothing that says several factors -- some long term -- could be in play before the meteor impact.

I think wat due to one, not very big bang, all dinosaurs on the entire earth can't vanish.

All the trilobites did. Extinctions happen. Extinctions of whole Classes (such as Dinosaurs and Trilobites) happened. Hundreds/thousands of species gone in a geological eyeblink.

A large enough meteor impact could kill every living thing -- including all the bacteria -- on the planet.

Now, you can also think of it this way: birds are a subgroup of dinosaurs. They evolved from one species of theropod dinosaurs (that's how evolution works -- the largest taxon started as a single species). Birds had diversified by the end of the Cretaceous to several Families. However, only about 5 bird species (from 3 different Families) survived the KT extinction. Interestingly, these all seemed to be birds that nested on the ground or underground. Thus,they were protected from the nuclear winter that followed the KT meteor impact. So, in one view, not "all" the "dinosaurs" vanished. 5 species survived. Of course, we call them "birds", but tomato, tomato.

A few species of frogs, turtles, alligators, etc. also survived. Again, species that spend part of their lifecycles underground and thus protected from the worst effects of the nuclear winter.

Paul Miller's first persecution of non-Millists is the one and only confirmed cause of of the extinction of the dinosaurs. I Paul Miller, personally yeeted on all the dinosauaruars.