DiscoDuck
I think I might know what causes the natural cycle of climate change. Don't react thinking this is an attack on the concept of man-made global warming, this would simply be knowledge. Neutral knowledge, that if correct would go a long way in understanding the situation and determining the extent, or lack thereof, of human effect on that natural cycle of climate change.
My idea is that the natural cycle of warming and cooling, that both sides of the debate aknowledge exists, is caused by the "wobble" of our own sun. We detect planets around other stars by the "wobble" they impart to the star. That "wobble" is actually more accurately described as a "micro orbit". I think the natural cycle of warming and cooling may be largely caused by the relationship of the orbits between the Earth and the Sun.
The sun is not sitting still, it has a tiny orbit ("wobble") of it's own. It only makes sense that this orbital relationship would impact the temperature on Earth.
If this orbital relationship could be precisely determined and modeled, that information could in turn be used to calculate the effect on Earth temps. This, in turn, would also reveal if any "extra warming" that is not accounted for by the orbital relationship exists.
I really think this is an area science should be looking into. On the surface the global warming crowd is likely to consider it an attack on their narrative, but in reality it vital information they need if they are actually scientists and not just in the climate business.
My idea is that the natural cycle of warming and cooling, that both sides of the debate aknowledge exists, is caused by the "wobble" of our own sun. We detect planets around other stars by the "wobble" they impart to the star. That "wobble" is actually more accurately described as a "micro orbit". I think the natural cycle of warming and cooling may be largely caused by the relationship of the orbits between the Earth and the Sun.
The sun is not sitting still, it has a tiny orbit ("wobble") of it's own. It only makes sense that this orbital relationship would impact the temperature on Earth.
If this orbital relationship could be precisely determined and modeled, that information could in turn be used to calculate the effect on Earth temps. This, in turn, would also reveal if any "extra warming" that is not accounted for by the orbital relationship exists.
I really think this is an area science should be looking into. On the surface the global warming crowd is likely to consider it an attack on their narrative, but in reality it vital information they need if they are actually scientists and not just in the climate business.