troedyrhiw
The use of the word "Celt Celtic" indicates the foolishness of the article under discussion...It just goes on and on with no author showing any embarressment whatsoever....sheesh
I have half a dozen 17th century books devoted to the Historical Record of Britain...NOWHERE is the word "celtic" celt" celtio" or even Keltio used..cover to covers..
The words Cymru,Cymri,Cymry,Khmri,Khymri,Khmyru, and Kimmorio.even Kimmerian are used throughout..
Why do "authors" make these "mistakes" when this is quite evident and has been available to the general public ever since the Internet came on line.Some Private Libraries are not all that private anymore.
Have these "authors" totally forgotten the rationale for the rewriting of the "Britons"(Welsh) history in 1714 ever since the the last Scottish King died and the reign was taken up by Queens Mary...a Virgin Queen.. who fulfilled her dreams of returning England to the Roman Catholic Church.
Then Elisabeth 1 yet another Virgin Queen..who really put "Britain" on the map and not for her heirs but the House of Hannover..the "mad George's" Georg Ludwig..and Georg August "The Hannovarians"..
However,as to wether King George V did not cherish the thought of being so closely tied to the NEW Anglo_Saxon dynastic is somewhat
troubling as in 1917 during WW1(4 years after start of war-a reminder for our US 'friends') he changed it to the House of Windsor from "Saxe-Coburg and Gotha "..Still German but easier off the tongue..don't you think.
Henry V111 from the Welsh House of the Tudors used the "divorce" excuse with the Vatican so as to believe once more as was his upbriging by his dad, the Welsh King Of England Henry V11 and educationary mentors had taught that the Old Britannica School of Christian teaching was "Protestant" while the Catholican scribes over the years had ammended the good book more times that the very concientious Rabbi's with the "Babylonian Talmud" who put together their torture text only 1500 years ago..just 150 years after the intial offering from the Church of Rome(Caths)..Both referred constantly to the Druidry Books of Christianity for ideas and defensive strategies.Druids were at that time were the intellectuals as far as the Romans were concerned and paid highly for their spouses and children education by visiting Druids..
THIS WAS IN THE FIRST CENTURY...WHILE JESUS WAS STILL ALIVE.
Most Historians,Etymoligists(philology) and Archeologists
are embarrassingly totally aware of this situation,but cannot extricate,disencumber themselves from history past
for their tenure has been hard fought/earned..yet they still attempt to send their students down the slippery slope of taught memory recall in differcult conditions that are changing and emerging, coming out into view from concealment every minute of the day...The fiasco with Climate-Gate is typical ..even with the recent "no wrong doing" investigative findings.....The liars cannot win.
Troedyrhiw
.
I have half a dozen 17th century books devoted to the Historical Record of Britain...NOWHERE is the word "celtic" celt" celtio" or even Keltio used..cover to covers..
The words Cymru,Cymri,Cymry,Khmri,Khymri,Khmyru, and Kimmorio.even Kimmerian are used throughout..
Why do "authors" make these "mistakes" when this is quite evident and has been available to the general public ever since the Internet came on line.Some Private Libraries are not all that private anymore.
Have these "authors" totally forgotten the rationale for the rewriting of the "Britons"(Welsh) history in 1714 ever since the the last Scottish King died and the reign was taken up by Queens Mary...a Virgin Queen.. who fulfilled her dreams of returning England to the Roman Catholic Church.
Then Elisabeth 1 yet another Virgin Queen..who really put "Britain" on the map and not for her heirs but the House of Hannover..the "mad George's" Georg Ludwig..and Georg August "The Hannovarians"..
However,as to wether King George V did not cherish the thought of being so closely tied to the NEW Anglo_Saxon dynastic is somewhat
troubling as in 1917 during WW1(4 years after start of war-a reminder for our US 'friends') he changed it to the House of Windsor from "Saxe-Coburg and Gotha "..Still German but easier off the tongue..don't you think.
Henry V111 from the Welsh House of the Tudors used the "divorce" excuse with the Vatican so as to believe once more as was his upbriging by his dad, the Welsh King Of England Henry V11 and educationary mentors had taught that the Old Britannica School of Christian teaching was "Protestant" while the Catholican scribes over the years had ammended the good book more times that the very concientious Rabbi's with the "Babylonian Talmud" who put together their torture text only 1500 years ago..just 150 years after the intial offering from the Church of Rome(Caths)..Both referred constantly to the Druidry Books of Christianity for ideas and defensive strategies.Druids were at that time were the intellectuals as far as the Romans were concerned and paid highly for their spouses and children education by visiting Druids..
THIS WAS IN THE FIRST CENTURY...WHILE JESUS WAS STILL ALIVE.
Most Historians,Etymoligists(philology) and Archeologists
are embarrassingly totally aware of this situation,but cannot extricate,disencumber themselves from history past
for their tenure has been hard fought/earned..yet they still attempt to send their students down the slippery slope of taught memory recall in differcult conditions that are changing and emerging, coming out into view from concealment every minute of the day...The fiasco with Climate-Gate is typical ..even with the recent "no wrong doing" investigative findings.....The liars cannot win.
Troedyrhiw
.