Islam
Islamic Political System Conceived
Posts  1 - 7  of  7
ShafiqKhan
For the first time in Islamic history Islamic Political System of Khilafah has been conceived on the basis of philosophy, history & Quran in the book 'Natural World Order & The Islamic Thought' which is available free on www.islamic-thought.com. The book discusses in detail how & why this is the only practicable political system under which peace & justice can prevail on this planet. It is clearly stated in the Quran that Khilafah will be established on this planet but for that Khilafah had to be conceived and its advantages spelled out. Read the book and spread the message of the book. In case anyone requires any clarification the same could be given on this discussion forum.
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  ShafiqKhan
Arfatzafar
Replied to:  For the first time in Islamic history Islamic Political System of...
Jazakallah.
Could you write something in details
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  Arfatzafar
ShafiqKhan
Replied to:  Jazakallah. Could you write something in details
The best approach would be to rectify religions of the wholesale corruptions for which humanity would need courageous philanthropist philosophers. The human religion is very simple in principle and also very simple to explain. Humans have souls and souls have three characteristics namely
1. Human Ego (the I of the individual)

1. Innate knowledge of the Creator

1. Innate Moral Law (innate knowledge of rightness & wrongness of all actions humans may do & even think of doing)

Now souls are not made up of matter and are made up of substance which cannot be physically seen.
In Quran it is stated at four places 'I have sent all the prophets to convey good news & as warners'
Good news is that human souls are eternal and warning is that humans will be answerable for the actions of his lifetime as to whether they lived in accordance of the defined Moral Law and in the afterlife their state of existence would depend upon their actions of the lifetime.
This is crux of religion & everything which contradicts these basic principles of religion is corruption.
Now their has to be a system of governance where the law is based on Moral Law.
A very brief synopsis would clarify my work to you & all members & justify the relevance of my work to paradigm shift in physics. Aristotle considered space as finite & absolute, time as absolute and matter as absolute thereby God had no power on space, time & matter but he empowered God with the power as Prime Mover of everything (matter). Newton through his laws held that matter moves in nature not because of God but because of inherent nature of matter by which matter attracts other matter.Coming to how Newton's Laws are wrong? From the time of Aristotle space was considered as finite & absolute till 1905. Thus at the time Newton also same perspective of space was held.
Now then finite space means that the universe has boundaries and according to Law of Gravitation the stars/galaxies on the periphery of the universe will be attracted towards the central universe and according to 2nd Law of Motion these peripheral stars/galaxies will accelerate towards the centre of the universe finally to collapse there. Thus finite space (the nature of space known at the time of Newton) and Law of Gravitation are contradictory. Newton assumed sun at rest but under Newton's Laws the rest condition of any celestrial object is just not possible. Having rejected the Descartes's aether and assumed the space as vacuum; in the 1st Law of Motion he states that objects with uniform (linear) motion faces absolutely no resistance but under second Law of Motion Newton states that objects pose resistance to the change in motion which he represented by inertia or mass. He assigns no physical reason to this resistance to the change in motion and it is here the philosophy/rationality was sacrificed on mathematics. Now even today physicists do not know what is mass & where it is in the particles. Adoption of Newton's Laws was the greatest scientific error in the history of science. This was done by Newton to reject the existence of aether which was scientifically introduced by Descartes. Newton introduced irrational & incorrect laws which closed the doors of investigation into the existence of God especially by rejecting the existence of aether which together with nature of light contained the secrets of reality. It is very well known that Newton laws cannot be correct as explained by Mach & others; whatever corrections were required those corrections Einstein introduced with the help very confusing trickeries (described in detail in my article Experimental & Theoretical Evidences of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe http://www.indjst.org; March2012). Now a paradigm of physics was defined by Einstein under which God just cannot exist. Four constituents of the universe were reduced to two by Einstein namely space-time concept and matter & energy transmutability where space is emergent, matter is emergent and time is interconnected with space. Philosophically for any existence including God there are two basic requirements namely space & substance. Without discussing the substance; by the emergent space is meant that space came into existence at a point in time as such there is no possiblity that eternal God could have existed before the space came into existence i.e. 13.7 billion years ago or thereafter. Both of them; Newton & Einstein; had rejected aether before introducing their laws & theories. Whereas aether has been shown to be existing and containing the secrets of light & time. Once aether is accepted space is again finite & absolute, time is relative depending upon motion of the observer, and as humans perceive it, time is emergent and matter is not absolute but emergent. Now for emergence of matter & time the existence of God is a pre-condition and once we investigate the matter, aether & forces in nature there have to be substances which do not have electromagnetic properties & cannot be seen. Soul & God being substances without any electromagnetic properties as such both cannot be seen.
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  ShafiqKhan
Ashcan
Replied to:  The best approach would be to rectify religions of the wholesale...
Islam leads to corruption because it does not put Civil law above all other Law, so allows some to say they are above the Law.

The reason Islam is currently collpsing in on itself and in some parts preaches such hatred and killing is precisely because there are those Muslims who think they are above Civil Law.

That directly leads to corruption and hence to poverty.

Why the West is Rich and the rest of the World catching up and having to stamp out Corruption (more in Muslim States than in others) is because there are those who do not realise that the Civil Law has to hbe seperate from Government.

Mursi is a good example of a Corrupt Politician who thinks he should be above the Law to introduce other Laws.

Nonesense of the most basic kind.


Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  Ashcan
ShafiqKhan
Replied to:  Islam leads to corruption because it does not put Civil law...
Anybody could read the mentioned book to see for himself that Islam is the most rational & natural religion on this planet and if there is any truth on this planetit is Quran. I accept that there are several misinterpretations & misrepresentations of the Islamic values but once corruptions are rectified it is the perfect religion for whole humanity. The mentioned discusses even the corruptions by so called scholars also. Read the book to beleive.
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  Ashcan
ali110
Replied to:  Islam leads to corruption because it does not put Civil law...
Can you mention some possible conflict of Islamic law and civil law for me.
Islamic law was given by revelation to man and whit the end of revelation it completed and described With the assistance of human intellect.
Intellect is God's gift to Human Evolution. So Whenever our knowledge did not Match god's law, Our understanding of religious sentences is wrong, otherwise Experimental and theoretical knowledge that we have achieved is wrong.
Save
Cancel
Reply
replied to:  ShafiqKhan
Arfatzafar
Replied to:  The best approach would be to rectify religions of the wholesale...
Thanks a lot. Great work!
Save
Cancel
Reply
 
x
OK