It seem wiki is the source of choice in this crud site.
anyone referencing anything from the supreme's group is just showing the have fallen for the propoganda of freemason's.
ridiculous.
Try the groups using sovereign, even check the ngo group's name...you say its supreme...no its not is sovereign...the supreme freemasonry pretenders didnt exist until 1997!
Whoever posted the crud on the post... is a mason and has led you down the garden path.
wiki as a source...you are joking right?