Australian Design Award
Encyclopedia
The Australian International Design Awards is an industry body established by the Industrial Design Council of Australia
(IDCA), founded in 1958. The Awards are Australia's only national design awards for industrial design
. Since 1991, the Australian International Design Awards has been a division of Standards Australia
.
In 2007 the Australian Design Awards expanded its entry criteria to include all professionally designed products on the Australian market, including products designed in Australia. From 2007, the Australian Design Awards became known as the Australian International Design Awards to reflect the global nature of the Awards.
The Australian International Design Awards has been recognised by the Commonwealth Government and the International Council of Societies of Industrial Design as a promotional body for the Australian design industry.
Special Awards include:
Fifty years on, the Australian International Design Awards, a division of Standards Australia, continues this proud tradition to recognise the best in Australian design and innovation.
“I think the time was exactly right in 1958 for the Council to be formed,” says Paul Schremmer of Schremmer Crick Design.
“In the mid 1950s, Australian manufacturers were just beginning to be aware of the need for industrial designers – the main impetus being reports of industrial design success in overseas trade journals mainly from America. By 1958, the time was ripe for a group of distinguished captains of industry to establish the Industrial Design Council of Australia,” he says.
Fellow industrial designer, Paul Cockburn agrees. At the time of the start of the IDCA, most companies carried out their own design work. Industrial designers self promoted, but the profession was largely misunderstood. Having an independent body dedicated to promoting Australian design and explaining the value of design to industry and consumers was an important step forward.
“Essentially anything industrial designers were doing was seen as self-serving and viewed with suspicion. Part of the growth of the industry was a result of the IDCA and the Design Awards,” Cockburn says.
“When you explain the process of design and why a product wins a Design Award, you essentially explain the difference between style, design and engineering. Style is about appearance; design is about the experience of a product. When you understand how it fits together that’s when the penny drops. It was very important for the IDCA to get that point across,” he says.
During the early 1960s, the IDCA - and Australian industrial design - began to flourish. From 1964, Good Design Labels, a visible indicator of quality design and manufacturing, began appearing on products in the marketplace and the IDCA-led Australian Design Index became a well-known register of the best designed and made products in Australia.
Together, these initiatives represented the formal start of design assessment and promotion in Australia, stimulating competition, debate, high standards of quality and industry growth.
Items ranging from light fittings, floor coverings, hand tools, hardware tools, furnishing fabrics and household products were reviewed by a panel of experts for inclusion in the Index. Judges evaluated products against criteria including standard of manufacturing and attention to detail and finish, suitability of materials used, durability, value for money, construction, comfort of use, safety factors and overall appearance.
Products meeting the rigorous criteria received the Good Design Label, while manufacturers falling down in areas were given constructive criticism on how to improve their products, as well as the opportunity to resubmit.
According to Schremmer, managers, engineers, designers and marketing staff were all determined to be honoured with the industry recognition.
“From the management down, manufacturers were very aware of the Good Design Label and later, the Australian Design Award. They were proud to see an Australian Design Award certificate displayed in their reception area” says Schremmer.
In 1964, the IDCA opened the first Australian Design Centre in Melbourne with a special exhibition of selected products from the Australian Design Index. Around the same time, lectures and seminars were held in Sydney and Melbourne for designers and others associated in product engineering, management, industrial design and marketing. A steady flow of Federal and state government funding assisted with the establishment of a new Design Centre in Sydney, with more centres to follow in other capital cities. Such was the success of the IDCA that the Commonwealth Government agreed to match dollar for dollar all donations to the Council from other sources.
The next big step for the IDCA was the introduction in 1967 of the Prince Philip Prize for Australian Design, supported by His Royal Highness, Prince Philip, The Duke of Edinburgh. With the aim of promoting greater awareness of good design in Australian engineering, this prestigious award recognised a product or system of Australian design closely associated with Australian life and industry, and which had made or was likely to make a substantial contribution to Australia’s economic progress. Much like the Australian Design Index, criteria included standard of manufacture and construction, inventiveness of design, originality, aesthetic appeal, ease of operation and marketability.
The inaugural Prince Philip Prize was awarded in 1968, during Prince Philip’s visit to Australia in May. Over 90 entries were received and the winning entry was a self-propelled grain header, designed by Kenneth Gibson. At the Awards presentation, Prince Philip said: “I hope this whole exercise will provoke a great deal of discussion and argument on the subject of Industrial Design. I don’t mind in the least if people disagree violently with our choice because it will mean that this is a subject worth attention and worthy of well-informed criticism…”
With Prince Philip as figurehead, the Prince Philip Prize thrived for the next 10 years. Manufacturers and designers strongly supported the program and consumer perception of design was growing.
The battle of convincing manufacturers of the value of design had largely been won: industrial design was regarded as an essential phase in any product development project.
“It was important for manufacturers to have a greater perception of design because they made the products that influenced the consumers. Back in the 1970s, no one knew what industrial design did and how it could add value to their product. Now they do,” says Robert Pataki, principal at Neo Technics.
“For somebody to win a Prince Philip Prize was a major accomplishment. It would help a company go on to great things and made other competitors and industry more aware of good design,” remembers Cockburn.
Despite the success of the Prince Philip Prize, the IDCA faced funding difficulties in the mid 1970s and was forced to temporarily close in 1976.
Strong industry rallying and a new injection of funds from the Commonwealth Government saw the Council reopen later that same year and a new ‘innovation’ recognition program was introduced to run alongside the Prince Philip Prize.
Recognising not only high quality but innovative Australian designed products, the Australian Design Award (ADA) program became a valuable promotional tool for manufacturers and designers and provided a source of revenue for the IDCA to continue its operations. The Prince Philip Prize continued to be awarded, but only to products which had received the ADA.
During this time, publicity was at an all time high. Televised coverage of the Awards presentation on ABC TV reached audiences of over 4 million and in 1979, the first annual yearbook of ADA winners was published. For a recognition program, the industry couldn’t ask for more.
For the next two decades, however, continuing funding issues, dwindling industry support and a lack of clear direction plagued the IDCA. In 1987 in an effort to reinvigorate the movement, the Government re-launched the IDCA as the Australian Design Council and the Prince Philip Prize was folded, leaving the ADA as Australia’s top design accolade.
In 1991, control of the Australian Design Council and the ADA program moved to Standards Australia. Closely aligned with Standards Australia’s aim of providing guidance to encourage basic levels of acceptability for products and services, the ADA was recognised as an important motivator of continual improvement and international best practice in Australia’s industrial design industry. Under Standards Australia, the ADA program continued to run, but the Australian Design Council was disbanded in 1993.
With declining industry support, new formats and incentives for the ADA program such as the Australian Design Mark certification scheme were road tested throughout the second half of the ‘90s with little success.
It wasn’t until 1997 that a revamped format, developed in close consultation with industry, was able to breathe life back into the Awards. Featuring a world-first online application form and first round internet shortlisting, the new program attracted more than 100 applications, with an encouraging 70 per cent submitted by the design industry. The first black tie Presentation Night was held at the Metro Theatre in Sydney with more than 200 attendees coming together to celebrate the best in Australian design.
“The feedback the ADA and Standards Australia received after the 1997 Design Awards was excellent and a clear indicator that the program was on the right road to recovery,” remembers Brandon Gien, Executive Director of the Australian International Design Awards.
“The key to success was the engagement of the industrial design profession – after all, it was their Awards program. With the help of the design industry, we managed to re-design the application and assessment processes, including a complete overhaul of the assessment criteria,” he says.
In 1998, profession-based categories were introduced posing new challenges for the judges but the industry continued to show support for the revised structure and another successful year was celebrated.
Unfortunately, however, the latest success of the Awards was not to last long. The program was still threatened by significant operating costs, leaving Standards Australia with a difficult decision regarding its future. Weighed down by high overheads including staff and offices in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland and Western Australia and limited revenue streams, the 1999 program was put on hold while Standards Australia explored other options to secure the future of the Awards. The majority of staff was made redundant and for the first time in many years, no Design Awards were presented in Australia.
Despite this setback, support from the industrial design community for Standards Australia’s continuing involvement in the Awards continued to grow. With no appropriate professional body that could inherit the program, industrial designers lobbied for Standards Australia to remain the caretaker. The Design Institute of Australia was approached to take over the program, however, the financial commitment to take on the Awards posed too great a risk for a member-based professional body such as this. With little interest from other compatible industry associations, the future of the Awards was now under serious threat.
“In 1999, the design industry lobbied hard for Standards Australia to keep the Awards going. It was clear that we needed to come up with a model that would satisfy designers in terms of credibility and rigour and provide a solid business proposition – both financially and strategically – to the Board of Standards Australia if the Awards were to continue under Standards Australia,” Gien explains.
Armed with a new business plan and financial model, strong support from the industrial design profession and a passion to see the Awards continue, the Board of Standards Australia approved another year for the Awards.
“In 2000 we launched the new ADA and introduced a two-tier approach – the Australian Design Mark to recognise Good Design and Australian Design Award in recognition of Design Excellence. This two-tier system allowed for a greater number of products to be recognised for their design merits and created a distinction between products that met the criteria for good design, and those that exceeded it. It also ensured that we were able to run the program at a break even budget, which, at least from a financial perspective, secured the future of the Awards,” Gien says.
For the next few years, the ADA continued to grow in standing and support, buoyed by financial stability. A very successful student design category was launched in 2002 supported by Dyson Appliances Australia and in 2004, product-focussed categories were introduced, the rigorous judging process was further refined and media was given new emphasis.
In 2008, on the 50th anniversary of rewarding design and innovation excellence in Australia, internationally designed products available for sale in Australia were allowed to enter the Awards for the first time. This bold move was aimed at raising the stakes for good design once again, allowing Australian design to be benchmarked against the best in the world. With the ongoing support of the design industry and Standards Australia, this opens the door to the next chapter in the illustrious history of the Design Awards.
, Ford XE Falcon
, Ford Territory
, Holden Commodore
VE Sportswagon, Holden Commodore
VE Ute, Blueye Sport Goggle designed by Paul Cohen (designer)
, the Victa Lawn Mower
, the Bionic Ear, the winged keel
, the VentrAssist Artificial Heart
, the Sunbeam
Mixmaster, the Test Series Cricket Helmet, the RØDE
Podcaster microphone, the Dolphin Torch and the Enzie Spiral Stair.
Industrial Design Council of Australia
The Industrial Design Council of Australia was established in 1958 and later became known as the Australian Design Council and then the Australian Design Awards. For over five decades this organisation has been the most active body promoting industrial design in Australia....
(IDCA), founded in 1958. The Awards are Australia's only national design awards for industrial design
Industrial design
Industrial design is the use of a combination of applied art and applied science to improve the aesthetics, ergonomics, and usability of a product, but it may also be used to improve the product's marketability and production...
. Since 1991, the Australian International Design Awards has been a division of Standards Australia
Standards Australia
Standards Australia was established in 1922 and is recognised through a Memorandum of Understanding with the Australian government as the peak non-government standards development body in Australia. It is a company limited by guarantee, with 72 members representing groups interested in the...
.
In 2007 the Australian Design Awards expanded its entry criteria to include all professionally designed products on the Australian market, including products designed in Australia. From 2007, the Australian Design Awards became known as the Australian International Design Awards to reflect the global nature of the Awards.
The Australian International Design Awards has been recognised by the Commonwealth Government and the International Council of Societies of Industrial Design as a promotional body for the Australian design industry.
Awards
There are three types of Accolades issued by the Australian International Design Awards, they are:- Australian International Design Mark (recognising Good Design)
- Australian International Design Award (recognising Design Excellence)
- Australian International Design Award of the Year (recognising the best product of the year)
Special Awards include:
- Award for Excellence in Sustainable Design
- Powerhouse Museum Design Award and Selection
- Wheels Automotive Design Award
History
In 1958, a small group of design and industry professionals established the Industrial Design Council of Australia (IDCA), funded by the Commonwealth Government. In an era when Australian industrial design was in its infancy, the goal of the IDCA was to educate manufacturers and consumers on the value of design, encourage and promote high standards of design in manufactured goods and foster an appreciation of good design among the wider community.Fifty years on, the Australian International Design Awards, a division of Standards Australia, continues this proud tradition to recognise the best in Australian design and innovation.
“I think the time was exactly right in 1958 for the Council to be formed,” says Paul Schremmer of Schremmer Crick Design.
“In the mid 1950s, Australian manufacturers were just beginning to be aware of the need for industrial designers – the main impetus being reports of industrial design success in overseas trade journals mainly from America. By 1958, the time was ripe for a group of distinguished captains of industry to establish the Industrial Design Council of Australia,” he says.
Fellow industrial designer, Paul Cockburn agrees. At the time of the start of the IDCA, most companies carried out their own design work. Industrial designers self promoted, but the profession was largely misunderstood. Having an independent body dedicated to promoting Australian design and explaining the value of design to industry and consumers was an important step forward.
“Essentially anything industrial designers were doing was seen as self-serving and viewed with suspicion. Part of the growth of the industry was a result of the IDCA and the Design Awards,” Cockburn says.
“When you explain the process of design and why a product wins a Design Award, you essentially explain the difference between style, design and engineering. Style is about appearance; design is about the experience of a product. When you understand how it fits together that’s when the penny drops. It was very important for the IDCA to get that point across,” he says.
During the early 1960s, the IDCA - and Australian industrial design - began to flourish. From 1964, Good Design Labels, a visible indicator of quality design and manufacturing, began appearing on products in the marketplace and the IDCA-led Australian Design Index became a well-known register of the best designed and made products in Australia.
Together, these initiatives represented the formal start of design assessment and promotion in Australia, stimulating competition, debate, high standards of quality and industry growth.
Items ranging from light fittings, floor coverings, hand tools, hardware tools, furnishing fabrics and household products were reviewed by a panel of experts for inclusion in the Index. Judges evaluated products against criteria including standard of manufacturing and attention to detail and finish, suitability of materials used, durability, value for money, construction, comfort of use, safety factors and overall appearance.
Products meeting the rigorous criteria received the Good Design Label, while manufacturers falling down in areas were given constructive criticism on how to improve their products, as well as the opportunity to resubmit.
According to Schremmer, managers, engineers, designers and marketing staff were all determined to be honoured with the industry recognition.
“From the management down, manufacturers were very aware of the Good Design Label and later, the Australian Design Award. They were proud to see an Australian Design Award certificate displayed in their reception area” says Schremmer.
In 1964, the IDCA opened the first Australian Design Centre in Melbourne with a special exhibition of selected products from the Australian Design Index. Around the same time, lectures and seminars were held in Sydney and Melbourne for designers and others associated in product engineering, management, industrial design and marketing. A steady flow of Federal and state government funding assisted with the establishment of a new Design Centre in Sydney, with more centres to follow in other capital cities. Such was the success of the IDCA that the Commonwealth Government agreed to match dollar for dollar all donations to the Council from other sources.
The next big step for the IDCA was the introduction in 1967 of the Prince Philip Prize for Australian Design, supported by His Royal Highness, Prince Philip, The Duke of Edinburgh. With the aim of promoting greater awareness of good design in Australian engineering, this prestigious award recognised a product or system of Australian design closely associated with Australian life and industry, and which had made or was likely to make a substantial contribution to Australia’s economic progress. Much like the Australian Design Index, criteria included standard of manufacture and construction, inventiveness of design, originality, aesthetic appeal, ease of operation and marketability.
The inaugural Prince Philip Prize was awarded in 1968, during Prince Philip’s visit to Australia in May. Over 90 entries were received and the winning entry was a self-propelled grain header, designed by Kenneth Gibson. At the Awards presentation, Prince Philip said: “I hope this whole exercise will provoke a great deal of discussion and argument on the subject of Industrial Design. I don’t mind in the least if people disagree violently with our choice because it will mean that this is a subject worth attention and worthy of well-informed criticism…”
With Prince Philip as figurehead, the Prince Philip Prize thrived for the next 10 years. Manufacturers and designers strongly supported the program and consumer perception of design was growing.
The battle of convincing manufacturers of the value of design had largely been won: industrial design was regarded as an essential phase in any product development project.
“It was important for manufacturers to have a greater perception of design because they made the products that influenced the consumers. Back in the 1970s, no one knew what industrial design did and how it could add value to their product. Now they do,” says Robert Pataki, principal at Neo Technics.
“For somebody to win a Prince Philip Prize was a major accomplishment. It would help a company go on to great things and made other competitors and industry more aware of good design,” remembers Cockburn.
Despite the success of the Prince Philip Prize, the IDCA faced funding difficulties in the mid 1970s and was forced to temporarily close in 1976.
Strong industry rallying and a new injection of funds from the Commonwealth Government saw the Council reopen later that same year and a new ‘innovation’ recognition program was introduced to run alongside the Prince Philip Prize.
Recognising not only high quality but innovative Australian designed products, the Australian Design Award (ADA) program became a valuable promotional tool for manufacturers and designers and provided a source of revenue for the IDCA to continue its operations. The Prince Philip Prize continued to be awarded, but only to products which had received the ADA.
During this time, publicity was at an all time high. Televised coverage of the Awards presentation on ABC TV reached audiences of over 4 million and in 1979, the first annual yearbook of ADA winners was published. For a recognition program, the industry couldn’t ask for more.
For the next two decades, however, continuing funding issues, dwindling industry support and a lack of clear direction plagued the IDCA. In 1987 in an effort to reinvigorate the movement, the Government re-launched the IDCA as the Australian Design Council and the Prince Philip Prize was folded, leaving the ADA as Australia’s top design accolade.
In 1991, control of the Australian Design Council and the ADA program moved to Standards Australia. Closely aligned with Standards Australia’s aim of providing guidance to encourage basic levels of acceptability for products and services, the ADA was recognised as an important motivator of continual improvement and international best practice in Australia’s industrial design industry. Under Standards Australia, the ADA program continued to run, but the Australian Design Council was disbanded in 1993.
With declining industry support, new formats and incentives for the ADA program such as the Australian Design Mark certification scheme were road tested throughout the second half of the ‘90s with little success.
It wasn’t until 1997 that a revamped format, developed in close consultation with industry, was able to breathe life back into the Awards. Featuring a world-first online application form and first round internet shortlisting, the new program attracted more than 100 applications, with an encouraging 70 per cent submitted by the design industry. The first black tie Presentation Night was held at the Metro Theatre in Sydney with more than 200 attendees coming together to celebrate the best in Australian design.
“The feedback the ADA and Standards Australia received after the 1997 Design Awards was excellent and a clear indicator that the program was on the right road to recovery,” remembers Brandon Gien, Executive Director of the Australian International Design Awards.
“The key to success was the engagement of the industrial design profession – after all, it was their Awards program. With the help of the design industry, we managed to re-design the application and assessment processes, including a complete overhaul of the assessment criteria,” he says.
In 1998, profession-based categories were introduced posing new challenges for the judges but the industry continued to show support for the revised structure and another successful year was celebrated.
Unfortunately, however, the latest success of the Awards was not to last long. The program was still threatened by significant operating costs, leaving Standards Australia with a difficult decision regarding its future. Weighed down by high overheads including staff and offices in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland and Western Australia and limited revenue streams, the 1999 program was put on hold while Standards Australia explored other options to secure the future of the Awards. The majority of staff was made redundant and for the first time in many years, no Design Awards were presented in Australia.
Despite this setback, support from the industrial design community for Standards Australia’s continuing involvement in the Awards continued to grow. With no appropriate professional body that could inherit the program, industrial designers lobbied for Standards Australia to remain the caretaker. The Design Institute of Australia was approached to take over the program, however, the financial commitment to take on the Awards posed too great a risk for a member-based professional body such as this. With little interest from other compatible industry associations, the future of the Awards was now under serious threat.
“In 1999, the design industry lobbied hard for Standards Australia to keep the Awards going. It was clear that we needed to come up with a model that would satisfy designers in terms of credibility and rigour and provide a solid business proposition – both financially and strategically – to the Board of Standards Australia if the Awards were to continue under Standards Australia,” Gien explains.
Armed with a new business plan and financial model, strong support from the industrial design profession and a passion to see the Awards continue, the Board of Standards Australia approved another year for the Awards.
“In 2000 we launched the new ADA and introduced a two-tier approach – the Australian Design Mark to recognise Good Design and Australian Design Award in recognition of Design Excellence. This two-tier system allowed for a greater number of products to be recognised for their design merits and created a distinction between products that met the criteria for good design, and those that exceeded it. It also ensured that we were able to run the program at a break even budget, which, at least from a financial perspective, secured the future of the Awards,” Gien says.
For the next few years, the ADA continued to grow in standing and support, buoyed by financial stability. A very successful student design category was launched in 2002 supported by Dyson Appliances Australia and in 2004, product-focussed categories were introduced, the rigorous judging process was further refined and media was given new emphasis.
In 2008, on the 50th anniversary of rewarding design and innovation excellence in Australia, internationally designed products available for sale in Australia were allowed to enter the Awards for the first time. This bold move was aimed at raising the stakes for good design once again, allowing Australian design to be benchmarked against the best in the world. With the ongoing support of the design industry and Standards Australia, this opens the door to the next chapter in the illustrious history of the Design Awards.
Previous winners
Previous winners include: Caroma's Invisi Series II Toilet Suite and Caroma's H2Zero Cube Urinal, Qantas A380 Economy Class Seat designed by Marc NewsonMarc Newson
Marc Newson was born in Sydney, Australia. Now based in London, he is a successful industrial designer who works in aircraft design, product design, furniture design, jewellery, and clothing. He incorporates a design style known as biomorphism to his various designs...
, Ford XE Falcon
Ford XE Falcon
The Ford XE Falcon is a car which was produced by the Ford Motor Company of Australia between 1982 and 1984. Introduced on 11 March 1982, the XE was a revised version of the XD Falcon, which it replaced...
, Ford Territory
Ford Territory
The Ford Territory is a crossover SUV built by Ford Australia and based on the EA169 platform of the Ford BA Falcon. It was released in April 2004. Its code name inside Ford was E265. It won the 2004 Wheels Car of the Year award, the reviewers praising car-like handling and practicality as reasons...
, Holden Commodore
Holden Commodore
The Holden Commodore is an automobile manufactured since 1978 by the Holden subsidiary of General Motors in Australia, and, formerly, in New Zealand. In the mid-1970s, Holden established proposals to replace the long-serving Kingswood nameplate with a smaller, Opel-based model...
VE Sportswagon, Holden Commodore
Holden Commodore
The Holden Commodore is an automobile manufactured since 1978 by the Holden subsidiary of General Motors in Australia, and, formerly, in New Zealand. In the mid-1970s, Holden established proposals to replace the long-serving Kingswood nameplate with a smaller, Opel-based model...
VE Ute, Blueye Sport Goggle designed by Paul Cohen (designer)
Paul Cohen (designer)
Paul Cohen is an industrial designer. Paul has won numerous design awards, including becoming an Overall Winner of an Australian Design Award, Good Design Award USA, and Red Dot Germany.- Career :...
, the Victa Lawn Mower
Lawn mower
A lawn mower is a machine that uses a revolving blade or blades to cut a lawn at an even length.Lawn mowers employing a blade that rotates about a vertical axis are known as rotary mowers, while those employing a blade assembly that rotates about a horizontal axis are known as cylinder or reel...
, the Bionic Ear, the winged keel
Winged keel
A winged keel is a sailboat keel, usually of moderate aspect ratio, that uses a nearly horizontal foil, the "wing", at the bottom to provide additional performance. Note that the wing is upside down with relation to the boat...
, the VentrAssist Artificial Heart
Artificial heart
An artificial heart is a mechanical device that replaces the heart. Artificial hearts are typically used in order to bridge the time to heart transplantation, or to permanently replace the heart in case transplantation is impossible...
, the Sunbeam
Sunbeam Products
Sunbeam Products is an American brand that has produced electric home appliances since 1910. Their products have included the Mixmaster mixer, the Sunbeam CG waffle iron, Coffeemaster and the fully automatic T20 toaster. Sunbeam is owned by Jarden Consumer Solutions after Jarden's acquisition in...
Mixmaster, the Test Series Cricket Helmet, the RØDE
Røde Microphones
RØDE Microphones, based in Silverwater, New South Wales, Australia, is a company, established in 1967 by Henry and Astrid Freedman, that designs and manufactures microphones and related accessories...
Podcaster microphone, the Dolphin Torch and the Enzie Spiral Stair.