Further and better particulars
Encyclopedia
In pleading
, further and better particulars refers to additional information required to provide sufficient accuracy with respect to a set of pleaded facts in an earlier document. The party who believes that the facts are insufficiently pleaded will issue a request for further and better particulars or a more particular statement of the relevant document. An insufficiently pleaded allegation would otherwise cause difficulty to reply to.
An example of an insufficiently particularised allegation in a pleading might be:
If the Defendant was aware of only two complaints that the Plaintiff had made to his wife, which related to a dog otherwise unconnected with the law suit, the Defendant would be very unwise to admit the allegation. Similarly, to either "not admit" or deny the allegation would invite a finding against himself on that point, and may lead to an award of costs. Accordingly, the Defendant could reasonably ask for the allegation to be better particularised so that he may plead to it properly.
A request for further and better particulars of the example above might read:
If the respondent to the request believes that the allegation was sufficiently particularised, and that the requesting party is simply fishing for more information or just being difficult, they would issue a short reply: "Not entitled" or "Sufficiently pleaded".
Requests for further and better particulars are sometimes confused with interrogatories
. However, requests for further and better particulars relate to pleadings (which define the issues), and interrogatories relate to evidence
(which proves or disproves pleaded allegations).
Pleading
In law as practiced in countries that follow the English models, a pleading is a formal written statement filed with a court by parties in a civil action, other than a motion...
, further and better particulars refers to additional information required to provide sufficient accuracy with respect to a set of pleaded facts in an earlier document. The party who believes that the facts are insufficiently pleaded will issue a request for further and better particulars or a more particular statement of the relevant document. An insufficiently pleaded allegation would otherwise cause difficulty to reply to.
An example of an insufficiently particularised allegation in a pleading might be:
- "Between the months of June and August, the Plaintiff repeatedly complained to members of the Defendant's family that the Defendant's family's dogs were trespassing on his property."
If the Defendant was aware of only two complaints that the Plaintiff had made to his wife, which related to a dog otherwise unconnected with the law suit, the Defendant would be very unwise to admit the allegation. Similarly, to either "not admit" or deny the allegation would invite a finding against himself on that point, and may lead to an award of costs. Accordingly, the Defendant could reasonably ask for the allegation to be better particularised so that he may plead to it properly.
A request for further and better particulars of the example above might read:
- "Of "Between the months of June and August, the Plaintiff repeatedly complained to members of the Defendant's family that the Defendant's family's dogs were trespassing on his property", please state:
-
- On how many occasions the Plaintiff alleges he complained as aforesaid;
- When, during the months of June, July and August, the complaints were alleged to have been made;
- Whether the complaints alleged to have been made were made orally, in writing or otherwise;
- To which members of the Plaintiff's family the complaints are alleged to have been made; and
- Whether the Plaintiff avers that the complaints (or any of them) were made with respect to the dog which the Plaintiff alleges bit him.
If the respondent to the request believes that the allegation was sufficiently particularised, and that the requesting party is simply fishing for more information or just being difficult, they would issue a short reply: "Not entitled" or "Sufficiently pleaded".
Requests for further and better particulars are sometimes confused with interrogatories
Interrogatories
In law, interrogatories are a formal set of written questions propounded by one litigant and required to be answered by an adversary, in order to clarify matters of fact and help to determine in advance what facts will be presented at any trial in the case.In civil cases, the issues to be decided...
. However, requests for further and better particulars relate to pleadings (which define the issues), and interrogatories relate to evidence
Evidence
Evidence in its broadest sense includes everything that is used to determine or demonstrate the truth of an assertion. Giving or procuring evidence is the process of using those things that are either presumed to be true, or were themselves proven via evidence, to demonstrate an assertion's truth...
(which proves or disproves pleaded allegations).