List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 364
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
cases from volume 364 of the United States Reports
:
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...
cases from volume 364 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...
:
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United States,
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585,
- Armstrong v. United States,
- United States v. Dege,
- Gonzales v. United StatesGonzales v. United StatesGonzales v. United States, 348 U.S. 407 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Jehovah's Witness was denied fair hearing because of failure to supply him with materials in his record.-Facts of the case:...
, - United States v. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co.,
- Massey Motors, Inc. v. United States,
- Hertz Corp. v. United States,
- Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc.,
- Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. FPC,
- Sun Oil Co. v. FPC,
- Wolfe v. North Carolina,
- Elkins v. United States,
- Rios v. United States,
- Ohio ex rel. Eaton v. Price,
- McCrary v. Indiana, (per curiam)
- Railroad Workers v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., (per curiam)
- McGrath v. Rhay, (per curiam)
- Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Livingston v. United States, (per curiam)
- Euziere v. United States, (per curiam)
- Camara v. United States, (per curiam)
- Cutting v. Bank of Alaska, (per curiam)
- Deitle v. United States, (per curiam)
- De Groat v. New York, (per curiam)
- California Co. v. Colorado, (per curiam)
- Thomas v. Michigan, (per curiam)
- Koppers Co. v. Pennsylvania, (per curiam)
- West v. California, (per curiam)
- Kahan v. California, (per curiam)
- Andrews v. San Bernardino, (per curiam)
- Hyam v. Upper Montgomery Joint Authority, (per curiam)
- Dunscombe v. Sayle, (per curiam)
- State Tax Comm'n of Ariz. v. Murray Co. of Tex., Inc., (per curiam)
- Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Mississippi Tax Comm'n, (per curiam)
- Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. Grimes, (per curiam)
- Ford v. Attorney General of Pa., (per curiam)
- Vaughn v. Ohio, (per curiam)
- Clinton v. Joshua Hendy Corp., (per curiam)
- Cepero v. Puerto Rico, (per curiam)
- Wachtel v. New York, (per curiam)
- Rummel v. Musgrave, (per curiam)
- Piccott v. Florida, (per curiam)
- Cooper v. Pitchess, (per curiam)
- Morales v. Galveston, (per curiam)
- New Mexico v. Colorado, (per curiam)
- All American Airways, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc., (per curiam)
- School Dist. of Abington Township v. Schempp, (per curiam)
- Dayton Rubber Co. v. Cordovan Associates, Inc., (per curiam)
- Standard Dredging Corp. v. Alabama, (per curiam)
- United States v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.,
- United States v. Hougham,
- Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc.,
- Kelley v. Raggio, (per curiam)
- Central Ill. Public Service Co. v. Illinois Commerce Comm'n, (per curiam)
- Ohio ex rel. King v. Shannon, (per curiam)
- Armco Steel Corp. v. Michigan, (per curiam)
- Riss & Co. v. Dalton, (per curiam)
- Mason v. Eckle, (per curiam)
- Gomillion v. LightfootGomillion v. LightfootGomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339 , was a United States Supreme Court decision that found an electoral district created to disenfranchise blacks violated the Fifteenth Amendment.- Decision :...
, - Chaunt v. United States,
- Knetsch v. United StatesKnetsch v. United StatesKnetsch v. United States, 364 U.S. 361 , was a decision by the United States Supreme Court concerning taxation law.The taxpayer was a saver who was convinced to buy a deferred annuity because the inside buildup on such policies is tax-deferred. However, he wanted to claim a deduction on the money...
, - McPhaul v. United States,
- Uphaus v. Wyman, (per curiam)
- Climate Control, Inc. v. Hill, (per curiam)
- Bobo v. Mayor & Councilmen of Savannah Beach, (per curiam)
- Meyer v. United States,
- Waterman S. S. Corp. v. Dugan & McNamara, Inc.,
- Polites v. United States,
- New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. v. Henagan, (per curiam)
- Thomas v. Virginia, (per curiam)
- Ford Motor Co. v. Pace, (per curiam)
- Dart Drug Corp. of Md. v. Gadol, (per curiam)
- King v. Ellis, (per curiam)
- Statham v. California, (per curiam)
- Small Business Administration v. McClellan,
- Boynton v. VirginiaBoynton v. VirginiaBoynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The case overturned a judgment convicting an African American law student for trespassing by being in a restaurant in a bus terminal which was "whites only." It held that racial segregation in public...
, - Scott v. California, (per curiam)
- Kirschke v. Houston, (per curiam)
- Riela v. New York, (per curiam)
- Beck v. Binks, (per curiam)
- Kotrich v. County of DuPage, (per curiam)
- Griffith v. California, (per curiam)
- Ray v. Ohio, (per curiam)
- Bandy v. United States, (per curiam)
- Pekao Trading Corp. v. Bragalini, (per curiam)
- Shelton v. Tucker,
- Bush v. Orleans Parish School Bd., (per curiam)
- United States v. LouisianaUnited States v. LouisianaUnited States v. Louisiana or Louisiana v. United States refers to a number of cases heard by the United States Supreme Court:*Louisiana v. United States, 103 U.S. 289 *United States v. Louisiana, 123 U.S. 32...
, - Davis v. United StatesDavis v. United StatesUnited States Supreme Court cases titled "Davis v. United States":*Davis v. United States - 564 U.S. ___*Davis v. United States - 512 U.S. 452...
, (per curiam) - Krupa v. Farmington River Power Co., (per curiam)
- Reina v. United States,
- Allred v. Heaton, (per curiam)
- Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Robertoy v. Michigan, (per curiam)
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.,
- NLRB v. Radio Engineers,
- Callanan v. United States,
- Lewis v. Manufacturers Nat. Bank of Detroit,
- Carbo v. United States,
- Denver Chicago Transport Co. v. United States,
- Oregon-Nevada-California Fast Freight, Inc. v. Stewart, (per curiam)
- Worthington Corp. v. Mlodozeniec, (per curiam)
- County of Lawrence v. United States, (per curiam)
- Sylvander v. Farmers & Traders Life Ins. Co., (per curiam)
- Beltowski v. Rigg, (per curiam)
- Ridgway Nat. Bank v. Pennsylvania, (per curiam)
- Travis v. United States,
- Railway Employees v. Wright,
- Radiant Burners, Inc. v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co., (per curiam)
- Kimbrough v. United StatesKimbrough v. United StatesIn Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 , the Supreme Court confirmed that federal district judges have discretion to impose sentences outside the range dictated by the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in cases involving conduct related to possession, distribution, and manufacture of crack...
, (per curiam) - Peck v. New York, (per curiam)