List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 385
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
cases from volume 385 of the United States Reports
:
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...
cases from volume 385 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...
:
- Senfour Investment Co. v. King County, (per curiam)
- Jones v. Association of Bar of City of New York, (per curiam)
- Morris Park, Inc. v. Buck, (per curiam)
- Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. United StatesBaltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. United StatesBaltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 592 , is a US Supreme Court case on contract law. The Supreme Court held that an implied in fact contract exists as, “an agreement … founded upon a meeting of minds, which, although not embodied in an express contract, is inferred, as a...
, (per curiam) - Buchanan v. Rhodes, (per curiam)
- Jordan v. Menomonee Falls, (per curiam)
- Bennett v. United States, (per curiam)
- Annbar Associates v. West Side Redevelopment Corp., (per curiam)
- Glick v. Ballentine Produce, Inc., (per curiam)
- Kronsbein v. Trustees of Schools of Township Three, (per curiam)
- Board of Satanta Joint Rural High School Dist. No. 2 v. Grant County Planning Board, (per curiam)
- Dowdle v. New York, (per curiam)
- Calcaterra v. Illinois, (per curiam)
- Tietz v. Marienthal, (per curiam)
- Reynolds v. Louisiana Bd. of Alcoholic Beverage Control, (per curiam)
- United States v. Ohio, (per curiam)
- Ferrante v. City of New York, (per curiam)
- Reed v. Illinois, (per curiam)
- Treffry v. Taylor, (per curiam)
- Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Fla., (per curiam)
- Maslowsky v. Cassidy, (per curiam)
- Bookcase, Inc. v. Leary, (per curiam)
- Guy v. Tahash, (per curiam)
- Neumann v. New York, (per curiam)
- McClellan v. Huston, (per curiam)
- Cross v. Bruning, (per curiam)
- Wakin v. Pennsylvania, (per curiam)
- Boyden v. May, (per curiam)
- Bradford v. Helman, (per curiam)
- Spiesel v. Roos, (per curiam)
- Bradford v. Postel, (per curiam)
- Kemp v. Hults, (per curiam)
- Phelper v. Decker, (per curiam)
- McGill v. Ryals, (per curiam)
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Trainmen, (per curiam)
- Giles v. Friendly Finance Co. of Biloxi, (per curiam)
- Johnson v. California, (per curiam)
- Colorado-Ute Elec. Assn., Inc. v. Western Colo. Power Co., (per curiam)
- Bradford v. Gavagan, (per curiam)
- Switzerland Cheese Assn., Inc. v. E. Horne's Market, Inc.,
- Black v. United States, (per curiam)
- Pittsburgh Towing Co. v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co., (per curiam)
- Kelsey v. Corbett, (per curiam)
- Carr v. Altus, (per curiam)
- Massey v. Georgia, (per curiam)
- Matranga v. McDonnell, (per curiam)
- Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Transit Union v. United States, (per curiam)
- Adderley v. FloridaAdderley v. FloridaAdderley v. Florida, 385 U.S. 39 , was a case in the Supreme Court of the United States over whether arrests for protesting in front of a jail were constitutional.-Background:...
, - Illinois Central R. Co. v. Norfolk & Western R. Co.,
- Cichos v. Indiana,
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. FPC,
- O'Connor v. Ohio, (per curiam)
- United States v. Saskatchewan Minerals, (per curiam)
- Board of Satanta Joint Rural High School Dist. No. 2 v. Haskell County Planning Board, (per curiam)
- Little v. Rhay, (per curiam)
- Board of Public Works of Md. v. Horace Mann League of United States of America, Inc., (per curiam)
- Hall v. Mississippi, (per curiam)
- Bank of Marin v. England,
- Badgley v. Hare, (per curiam)
- Boyden v. California, (per curiam)
- Battaglia v. United States, (per curiam)
- Bond v. Floyd,
- United States v. Acme Process Equipment Co.,
- United States v. Demko,
- Transportation-Communication Employees v. Union Pacific R. Co.,
- Canada Packers, Ltd. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., (per curiam)
- Watkins v. Conway, (per curiam)
- Long v. District Court of Iowa, Lee Cty., (per curiam)
- Walker v. Southern R. Co., (per curiam)
- New England Motor Rate Bureau, Inc. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Cady v. Missouri ex rel. State Highway Comm'n of Mo., (per curiam)
- Ministers Life & Casualty Union v. Haase, (per curiam)
- Lewis v. United States,
- INS v. Errico,
- Fortson v. Morris,
- First Nat. Bank of Logan v. Walker Bank & Trust Co.,
- United States v. Fabrizio,
- Woodby v. INS,
- Hoffa v. United States,
- Osborn v. United States,
- Department of Employment v. United States,
- Heider v. Michigan Sugar Co., (per curiam)
- Parker v. Gladden, (per curiam)
- Mason v. Biloxi, (per curiam)
- French v. California, (per curiam)
- Exley Express, Inc. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Laird & Co. v. Cheney, (per curiam)
- Schipani v. United States, (per curiam)
- General Motors Corp. v. Appeal Bd. of Mich. Employment Security Comm'n, (per curiam)
- Time, Inc. v. HillTime, Inc. v. HillTime, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374 is a United States Supreme Court case involving issues of privacy as discussed in balance with the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and principles of freedom of speech.-Background:...
, - NLRB v. C & C Plywood Corp.,
- NLRB v. Acme Industrial Co.,
- Swann v. Adams,
- In re Meeker, (per curiam)
- Garcia v. Morales, (per curiam)
- Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, (per curiam)
- Nave v. Seattle, (per curiam)
- Glouner v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Los Angeles, (per curiam)
- Bogart v. Traynor, (per curiam)
- Webster v. Lee County Dist. Court, (per curiam)
- Hunter v. New York, (per curiam)
- Roosevelt Raceway, Inc. v. County of Nassau, (per curiam)
- Nehring v. DeKalb, (per curiam)
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Gerosa, (per curiam)
- Duddleston v. Grills, (per curiam)
- Droste v. Kerner, (per curiam)
- Illinois Central R. Co. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Lassen v. Arizona ex rel. Arizona Highway Dept.,
- United States v. Laub,
- Travis v. United States,
- Garrity v. New JerseyGarrity v. New JerseyGarrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that law enforcement officers and other public employees have the right to be free from compulsory self-incrimination...
, - Spevack v. Klein,
- McLeod v. General Elec. Co., (per curiam)
- Alexander v. Board of Review, (per curiam)
- McConaghy v. McConaghy, (per curiam)
- Short v. Ness Produce Co., (per curiam)
- Sims v. Georgia,
- Whitus v. GeorgiaWhitus v. GeorgiaWhitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 545 , found in favor of the plaintiff , who had been convicted for murder, and as such reversed their convictions...
, - Spencer v. Texas,
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y.,
- Berenyi v. District Director, INS,
- Floyd & Beasley Transfer Co. v. United States, (per curiam)
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Los Angeles, (per curiam)
- D'Amico v. National Broadcasting Co., (per curiam)
- McQuaid v. California, (per curiam)
- Fein v. New York, (per curiam)
- Sprowal v. New York, (per curiam)
- Patterson v. Newport News, (per curiam)
- Maxwell v. Bishop, (per curiam)