• Bartlett v. Strickland
  Bartlett v. Strickland
  Bartlett v. Strickland, 556 U.S. 1 , was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court on March 9, 2009. In a plurality decision, the Court held that a minority group must constitute a numerical majority of the voting-age population in an area before §2 of the Voting Rights Act would require...
  
  (Docket No. 07-689)
• Vaden v. Discover Bank (Docket No. 07-773)
• Vermont v. Brillon (Docket No. 08-88)
• Kansas v. Colorado (Docket No. 105, Orig.)
• Knowles v. Mirzayance (Docket No. 07-1315)
• Puckett v. United States (Docket No. 07-9712)
• Rivera v. Illinois
  Rivera v. Illinois
  Rivera v. Illinois was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 2009. Oral arguments took place Monday, February 23, 2009.- Issue :...
  
  (Docket No. 07-9995)
• Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs (Docket No. 07-1372)
• Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Williams
  Philip Morris USA v. Williams
  Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 549 U.S. 346 , was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which held that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment bars punitive damages for harm caused to individuals not involved in the litigation.Mayola Williams, the widow of Jesse D...
  
  (Docket No. 07-1216)
• Harbison v. Bell
  Harbison v. Bell
  Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. ___ was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that federal law gave indigent death row inmates the right to federally appointed counsel to represent them in post-conviction state clemency proceedings, when the state has declined to do so...
  
  (Docket No. 07-8521)
• Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc. (Docket No. 07-588)
• 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett (Docket No. 07-581)
• United States v. Navajo Nation
  United States v. Navajo Nation
  United States v. Navajo Nation is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Navajo Nation initiated proceedings in the Court of Federal Claims alleging that when they sought the assistance of the United States Secretary of the Interior to renegotiate their original leasing agreement with the...
  
  (Docket No. 07-1410)
• Corley v. United States (Docket No. 07-10441)
• Arizona v. Gant
  Arizona v. Gant
  Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 , was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires law enforcement officers to demonstrate an actual and continuing threat to their safety posed by an arrestee, or a need to preserve evidence...
  
  (Docket No. 07-542)
• Ministry of Defense and Support for Armed Forces of Islamic Republic of Iran v. Elahi (Docket No. 07-615)
• Shinseki v. Sanders (Docket No. 07-1209)
• Nken v. Holder (Docket No. 08-681)
• Cone v. Bell (Docket No. 07-1114)
• FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (Docket No. 07-582)
• Dean v. United States
  Dean v. United States
  Dean v. United States was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court upholding a 10 year penalty for the discharge of a firearm during the commission of any violent or drug trafficking crime, against a bank robber whose gun went off accidentally.- Facts :In 2004, a bank robber, Christopher M...
  
  (Docket No. 08-5274)
• Kansas v. Ventris (Docket No. 07-1356)
• Burlington N. & S. F. R. Co. v. United States (Docket No. 07-1601)
• Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle (Docket No. 08-146)
• Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc. (Docket No. 07-1437)
• Flores-Figueroa v. United States
  Flores-Figueroa v. United States
  Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. ___ , was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, holding that the law enhancing the sentence for identity theft requires proof that an individual knew that the identity card or number he had used belonged to another, actual person...
  
  (Docket No. 08-108)
• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937 , was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that top government officials were not liable for the actions of their subordinates absent evidence that they ordered the allegedly discriminatory activity...
  
  (Docket No. 07-1015)
• AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen
  AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen
  AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen is a 2009 legal case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that maternity leave taken before the passage of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act cannot be considered in calculating employee pension benefits.-Background:...
  
  (Docket No. 07-543)
• Haywood v. Drown
  Haywood v. Drown
  Haywood v. Drown , was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court held that that a New York law preventing state trial courts from hearing claims for money damages against prison employees whether based on federal or state law violated the Supremacy Clause of the United...
  
  (Docket No. 07-10374)
• Montejo v. Louisiana
  Montejo v. Louisiana
  Montejo v. Louisiana, 556 U.S. ___ , is a 5–4 decision by the United States Supreme Court that overruled the Court's decision in Michigan v. Jackson, . Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion...
  
  (Docket No. 07-1529)
• Abuelhawa v. United States
  Abuelhawa v. United States
  Abuelhawa v. United States , was a decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that a defendant who used a cellphone for the misdemeanor purchase of cocaine could not be charged with a felony for using a "communication facility" to facilitate the distribution of an illegal drug under...
  
  (Docket No. 08-192)
• Bobby v. Bies (Docket No. 08-598)
• CSX Transp., Inc. v. Hensley (Docket No. 08-1034)
• Republic of Iraq v. Beaty (Docket No. 07-1090)
• Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co. (Docket No. 08-22)
• United States v. Denedo (Docket No. 08-267)
• United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New York
  United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New York
  United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New York, No. 08-660, 556 U.S. ___ , was a recent case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that where the Government has not intervened or actively participated, private plaintiffs under the False Claims Act must filed an appeal within 30...
  
  (Docket No. 08-660)
• Boyle v. United States (Docket No. 07-1309)
• Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. Chrysler LLC (Docket No. 08A1096)

External links

• Supreme Court list of slip opinions, 2008