List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 564
Encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court
Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all state and federal courts, and original jurisdiction over a small range of cases...

 cases from volume 564 of the United States Reports
United States Reports
The United States Reports are the official record of the rulings, orders, case tables, and other proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. Opinions of the court in each case, prepended with a headnote prepared by the Reporter of Decisions, and any concurring or dissenting opinions are...

:
  • Sykes v. United States
    Sykes v. United States
    Sykes v. United States, No. 09-11311 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that felony vehicle flight, as proscribed by Indiana law, is a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act...

    , 09-11311
  • Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
    Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
    Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., No. 10-313 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Federal Communications Commission had advanced a reasonable interpretation of its regulations in a dispute with AT&T.-External links:*...

    , 10-313
  • DePierre v. United States
    DePierre v. United States
    DePierre v. United States, No. 09-1533 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the use of the term "cocaine base" in 21 U.S.C. §841 refers to cocaine in its chemically basic form.-External links:*...

    , 09-1533
  • Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership
    Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership
    Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership, 564 U.S. ---, was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that an invalidity defense in a patent infringement lawsuit must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.-External links:*...

    , 10-290
  • Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan, 10-568
  • Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders
    Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders
    Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, No. 09-525 , was a recent case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a service provider cannot be held liable in a private action under SEC Rule 10b-5.-External links:*...

    , 09-525
  • United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation
    United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation
    United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation, No. 10-382 , was a recent case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the fiduciary exception to attorney-client privilege does not apply to the general trust relationship between the United States and Indian tribes.-External links:*...

    , 10-382
  • Flores-Villar v. United States, 09-5801
  • Bond v. United States
    Bond v. United States (2010)
    Bond v. United States is a Tenth Amendment case for the Supreme Court of the United States decided in late June 2011.-Background:The husband of Carol A...

    , 09-1227
  • Davis v. United States
    Davis v. United States (2011)
    Davis v. United States, No. 09-11328 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule....

    , 09-11328
  • J.D.B. v. North Carolina
    J.D.B. v. North Carolina
    J.D.B. v. North Carolina, No. 09-11121 , was a recent case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a child’s age properly informs the Miranda custody analysis. The petitioner J.D.B. was a 13 year old student enrolled in special education classes whom police had suspected of...

    , 09-11121
  • Smith v. Bayer Corp., 09-1205
  • Tapia v. United States
    Tapia v. United States
    Tapia v. United States, No. 10-5400 , was a case in which United States Supreme Court held that a federal court cannot give a criminal defendant a longer sentence to promote rehabilitation.-Background:...

    , 10-5400
  • Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
    Wal-Mart v. Dukes
    Wal-Mart v. Dukes is a United States Supreme Court case. The case is an appeal from the Ninth Circuit's decision in Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., in which that court, eventually by a narrow 6-5 decision, affirmed the district court's decision to certify a class action lawsuit in which the...

    , 10-277
  • Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
    Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
    Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri, No. 09-1476 , was a recent case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held the public concern test limits Petition Clause claims by public employees.-Termination and Reinstatement :...

    , 09-1476
  • American Elec. Power Co. v. Connecticut
    AEP v. Connecticut
    AEP v. Connecticut is a United States Supreme Court case. Although the case is about whether states can seek to curtail greenhouse gas emissions from utilities across state borders using federal common law theories of interstate nuisance, the ultimate issue facing the Court was whether climate...

    , 10-174
  • Turner v. Rogers
    Turner v. Rogers
    Turner v. Rogers, is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court on June 20, 2011, that held that a state must provide safeguards to reduce the risk of erroneous deprivation of liberty in civil contempt cases such as child support cases...

    , 10-10
  • Stern v. Marshall, 10-179
  • Freeman v. United States, 09-10245
  • Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc.
    Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc.
    Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc., No. 10-779 , was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Vermont statute that restricted the sale, disclosure, and use of records that revealed the prescribing practices of individual doctors violated the First Amendment.-Background:In 2007...

    , 10-779
  • PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing, 09-993
  • Bullcoming v. New Mexico
    Bullcoming v. New Mexico
    Bullcoming v. New Mexico is a significant Confrontation Clause case decided by the United States Supreme Court. On June 23, 2011, the Supreme Court considered the issue whether a defendant's Confrontation Clause rights extent to a non-testifying laboratory analyst whose supervisor testifies as to...

    , 09-10876
  • CSX Transp., Inc. v. McBride, 10-235
  • Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club v. Bennett, 10-238
  • Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn., 08-1448
  • J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro, 09-1343
  • Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 10-76
  • United States v. Juvenile Male
    United States v. Juvenile Male
    United States v. Juvenile Male may refer to two per curiam opinions by the Supreme Court of the United States handed down at different times in the same case:...

    , 09-940
  • Leal Garcia v. Texas
    Leal Garcia v. Texas
    Leal Garcia v. Texas, No. 11-5001 , was a ruling in which the Supreme Court of the United States denied Humberto Leal García's application for stay of execution and application for writ of habeas corpus. Leal was subsequently executed by lethal injection...

    , 11-5001

External links

The source of this article is wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.  The text of this article is licensed under the GFDL.
 
x
OK