Re Selectmove Ltd [1995] 1 WLR 474 is an
English contract lawEnglish contract law is a body of law regulating contracts in England and Wales. With its roots in the lex mercatoria and the activism of the judiciary during the industrial revolution, it shares a heritage with countries across the Commonwealth , and the United States...
case, concerning the doctrine of consideration, and part payments of debt.
Facts
Selectmove Ltd owed the Inland Revenue substantial sums in outstanding tax and national insurance. The managing director, Mr ffooks, met with Mr Polland, from the Inland Revenue and said he would pay future tax as it fell due and the arrears at £1000 a month. Mr Polland said he would have to check and would contact the managing director if it was unacceptable. Selectmove Ltd heard nothing till a £25,650 notice came in and a threat of a wind-up petition. Mr ffooks subsequently claimed that the Revenue had said he could repay less. The High Court held that even if that were found to be true, Mr Polland had not bound the Revenue, and there was no consideration for the varied agreement anyway.
Judgment
Peter Gibson LJ (Stuart-Smith LJ and Balcombe LJ concurring) said that the House of Lords case,
Foakes v Beer precluded any variation of the agreement to repay the debt without good consideration, despite the recent decision in
Williams v Roffey Bros Ltd. Peter Gibson LJ state ‘it is clear… that a practical benefit of that nature is not good consideration in law’. He felt bound by
Foakes and could not apply Roffey to leave it without any application, despite seeing the 'force of argument'.
The source of this article is
wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The text of this article is licensed under the
GFDL.