The Legitimation of Power
Encyclopedia
The Legitimation of Power by David Beetham
is a famous political theory text. The book examines the legitimation of power as an essential issue for social scientists to take into account - looking at both relationships between legitimacy and the variety of contemporary political systems.
in the Times Higher Education Supplement as being an "admirable text", "far reaching in its scope" and "extraordinary in the clarity with which it covers a wide range of material" "One can have nothing but the highest regard for this volume." And it has also been praised by Zygmunt Bauman
in the journal Sociology who argues that it is "a study bound to revolutionize sociological thinking and teaching", that it is "Seminal and profoundly original" and that it "should become the obligitory reading for every teacher and practitioner of social science."
A problem with "legitimacy" that this work, according to Steffek clearly emphasises is that the term is used both prescriptively and descriptively. From the prescriptive point of view social scientists should be able to suggest when governance deserves to be described as legitimate. From the descriptive point of view social scientists should be able to suggest why those subjected to governance agree to accept and support it (or reject it). As for the first project, there is a well-established strand of normative research that discusses a prescriptive version of legitimacy.
David Beetham
David Beetham is a social theorist who has made extensive contributions in the fields of democracy and human rights; including in his approach to the role of not only social but also economic rights.- Career :...
is a famous political theory text. The book examines the legitimation of power as an essential issue for social scientists to take into account - looking at both relationships between legitimacy and the variety of contemporary political systems.
Notability
It has been praised by David HeldDavid Held
David Held is a British political theorist active in the field of international relations. He will be chair of politics and international relations at Durham University from January 2012 and is currently Graham Wallas Professor of Political Science and co-director of the Centre for the Study of...
in the Times Higher Education Supplement as being an "admirable text", "far reaching in its scope" and "extraordinary in the clarity with which it covers a wide range of material" "One can have nothing but the highest regard for this volume." And it has also been praised by Zygmunt Bauman
Zygmunt Bauman
Zygmunt Bauman is a Polish sociologist who, since 1971, has resided in England after being driven out of Poland by an anti-Semitic campaign, engineered by the Communist government which he had previously supported...
in the journal Sociology who argues that it is "a study bound to revolutionize sociological thinking and teaching", that it is "Seminal and profoundly original" and that it "should become the obligitory reading for every teacher and practitioner of social science."
Structure of the book
The book is diveded in two parts. The first part looks at the criteria for legitimacy. Outlining the Social-Scientific Concept of Legitimacy; Power and its need of Legitimation; the intellectual Structure of legitimacy generally and the social science and the social construction of legitimacy in particular. The second part of the work examines the legitimacy of the contemporary states. Outlining the dimensions of state Legitimacy, the tendencies of political systems to have crisis; various modes of non-legitimate power. This part concludes with a look at legitimacy in both political science and political philosophy.A problem with "legitimacy" that this work, according to Steffek clearly emphasises is that the term is used both prescriptively and descriptively. From the prescriptive point of view social scientists should be able to suggest when governance deserves to be described as legitimate. From the descriptive point of view social scientists should be able to suggest why those subjected to governance agree to accept and support it (or reject it). As for the first project, there is a well-established strand of normative research that discusses a prescriptive version of legitimacy.